The Tariff That Built America
by Lynn Miteva
The Tariff Act of 1789:
A Revolutionary Revenue Machine
Most Americans are better at memorizing TikTok dances than understanding the economic policies that shaped our nation.
But if you want to appreciate how the U.S. became an economic powerhouse, you need to look back at history.
The Tariff Act of 1789—a piece of legislation that quietly laid the foundation for America’s financial independence.
This was the very first major law under the new Constitution. The government was flat broke after the Revolution. No income tax. Just vibes and war debt.
​
Signed into law by President George Washington on July 4, 1789 (because why not make it extra patriotic) this act wasn’t just about taxing imports—it was about survival. The fledgling United States was drowning in Revolutionary War debt, and Congress needed cash to keep the government afloat.
James Madison introduced the bill in the House of Representatives.
Madison initially envisioned modest tariffs to raise revenue without upsetting Southern agricultural interests.
But Alexander Hamilton, then Secretary of the Treasury, had bigger plans.
Hamilton saw tariffs as a tool to protect American industries from being crushed by cheap British goods and to encourage domestic manufacturing.
​
Though not yet in Congress, Hamilton’s influence loomed large, and his vision for a protectionist economy would later crystallize in his Report on Manufactures (1791).
What Did It Do?
The act imposed duties ranging from 5% to 15% on most imported goods and levied tonnage taxes on foreign ships. Its three key objectives were:
-
Revenue Generation: Before income taxes existed, tariffs funded nearly all federal government operations.
-
Industrial Protection: By making British goods more expensive, it gave American manufacturers breathing room to grow.
-
Economic Independence: Just as the Revolution severed political ties with Britain, this tariff was a bold step toward economic autonomy.
​
Enemies and Allies: A Nation Divided The debates surrounding the tariff exposed sharp sectional divides. Northern manufacturers cheered high duties as essential for protecting their nascent industries. Southern planters, however, feared higher prices on imported goods they relied on and worried that tariffs disproportionately favored Northern states.
​
Madison navigated these tensions skillfully but couldn’t include provisions targeting British imports—a missed opportunity that still rankled Hamilton’s camp.
Hamilton’s Vision vs Madison’s Pragmatism
​
While Madison sought compromise, Hamilton pushed for aggressive industrial policies. He believed tariffs weren’t just about revenue—they were about reshaping America’s economy to compete globally.
His advocacy helped ignite America’s Industrial Revolution—starting with Samuel Slater often called the "Father of the American Industrial Revolution" smuggling British textile manufacturing techniques into the U.S.
​
Why It Worked ?
​
The Tariff Act didn’t just fund government—it catalyzed industrial growth. Protected by tariffs, early American industries like textiles began to flourish despite fierce competition from Britain.
​
The act signaled that the United States was serious about defending its economic interests—a message that resonated globally.​​